MAHARSHI SARMA, ADVOCATE vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU — I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER3RULE4. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010104392026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5956/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER3RULE4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARSHI SARMA, ADVOCATE

    Adv. MR. M K CHOUDHURY,MR. M SARMA,MR. M SARMA, ,MR. M SARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

  5. 5.THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

  6. 6.THE HEADMASTER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed Maharshi Sarma's application to withdraw as counsel for the writ petitioner under Order 3 Rule 4 CPC. The court struck off the names of four advocates (M.K. Choudhury, M. Sarmah, P. Bharadwaj, and A. Chodhury) from the case after the petitioner repeatedly failed to provide instructions despite counsel's requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed Maharshi Sarma's application to withdraw as counsel for the writ petitioner under Order 3 Rule 4 CPC. The court struck off the names of four advocates (M.K. Choudhury, M. Sarmah, P. Bharadwaj, and A. Chodhury) from the case after the petitioner repeatedly failed to provide instructions despite counsel's requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case