TAIZUL ISLAM vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, P AND R.D. — WP(C)/2769/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010104282026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5949/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2769/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10169 - Other cases under the Panchayat Acts. ( 162 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAIZUL ISLAM

    Adv. MR. D A KAIYUM,MR. M S MONDAL,MR. M S MONDAL, ,MR. M S MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, P AND R.D.

  2. 2.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  4. 4.THE SECRETARY, FULERCHAR GAON PANCHAYAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court disposed of petitioner Taizul Islam's writ petition seeking remission of ₹1,82,402 settlement amount for operating a river launch ghat. The ghat became non-operational due to river bank erosion and low water levels, preventing full lease period operation. The court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh remission application to the Principal Secretary within 10 days, directing expeditious consideration within one month, with no coercive action permitted pending decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2769/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court disposed of petitioner Taizul Islam's writ petition seeking remission of ₹1,82,402 settlement amount for operating a river launch ghat. The ghat became non-operational due to river bank erosion and low water levels, preventing full lease period operation. The court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh remission application to the Principal Secretary within 10 days, directing expeditious consideration within one month, with no coercive action permitted pending decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case