SRI RATUL DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC, AFDC — WP(C)/2798/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010104192026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5946/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2798/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI RATUL DAS

    Adv. MR. H. BURAGOHAIN,MR. C AGARWAL,MR. C AGARWAL, ,M BURAGOHAIN,MS A DEVI,MS. H BORAH,MR. C AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC, AFDC

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

  3. 3.THE ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD

  4. 4.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

  5. 5.SRI MADHAB CHANDRA DAS

  6. 6.SRI ASHIM HAZARIKA

  7. 7.SRI BIJOY DAS

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2798/2026 Sri Ratul Das challenged the procedure adopted by Assam Fisheries authorities in settling the Dighali Bhangamur Fishery, Sivasagar. The petitioner ranked 7th out of 8 bidders in the financial bid opening, with no allegations against the highest bidder. The court issued notice returnable in 4 weeks, stayed the fishery settlement pending petition outcome, and directed the petitioner to serve notice on respondents 5-7 within 2 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2798/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2798/2026 Sri Ratul Das challenged the procedure adopted by Assam Fisheries authorities in settling the Dighali Bhangamur Fishery, Sivasagar. The petitioner ranked 7th out of 8 bidders in the financial bid opening, with no allegations against the highest bidder. The court issued notice returnable in 4 weeks, stayed the fishery settlement pending petition outcome, and directed the petitioner to serve notice on respondents 5-7 within 2 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case