ABDUL KUDDUS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,GA, ASSAM — I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 220. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010104182026
e-Filing Number
25-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5945/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABDUL KUDDUS
Adv. MS. J DEKA,MR S SARMA,MR S SARMA, ,MS. A TALUKDAR,MR S SARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,GA, ASSAM
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
-
3.THE DIRECTOR
-
4.THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
-
5.THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KAMRUP
-
6.THE SECRETARY
-
7.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CID (Criminal Investigation Department)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
Summary of I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Kuddus's application to correct a typographical error in a prior order dated 10.11.2025. The court corrected the date '07.09.2020' to '07.09.2022' in the order relating to his claims for 3% D.A. increment arrears, service gap regularization, and time scale benefits. Both respondent counsel consented to the correction, and the application was disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026
Summary of I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Kuddus's application to correct a typographical error in a prior order dated 10.11.2025. The court corrected the date '07.09.2020' to '07.09.2022' in the order relating to his claims for 3% D.A. increment arrears, service gap regularization, and time scale benefits. Both respondent counsel consented to the correction, and the application was disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts