MANJIL HUSSAIN AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/2835/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010103652026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5913/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2835/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJIL HUSSAIN AND ANR
Adv. MR. A M AHMED,MR. S U AHMED,MR. S U AHMED, ,B DAS,P. GHOSH,MR. S U AHMED
-
2.ZAHEDUL ISLAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE
-
2.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR,
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER
-
5.THE SUB REGISTRAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2835/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. Notice issued to respondents; petitioners' counsel must provide extra copies of the writ petition to respondent counsel within three days. Key Issue: Petitioners sought to register a land sale deed after obtaining NOC (No Objection Certificate) on 23.06.2024. State authorities refused registration citing an Office Memorandum dated 06.09.2024 banning new land sale permissions. Petitioners contend the memorandum has no retrospective effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2835/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2835/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. Notice issued to respondents; petitioners' counsel must provide extra copies of the writ petition to respondent counsel within three days. Key Issue: Petitioners sought to register a land sale deed after obtaining NOC (No Objection Certificate) on 23.06.2024. State authorities refused registration citing an Office Memorandum dated 06.09.2024 banning new land sale permissions. Petitioners contend the memorandum has no retrospective effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts