SUDIP PAITYA vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 3 ORS. Advocate - SC, PNB — I.A.(Civil)/1810/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XXXIX, RULE 1, RULE 2, SEC. 151. Status: Admission.

Admission

CNR: GAHC010103632026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5912/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1810/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XXXIX, RULE 1, RULE 2, SEC. 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDIP PAITYA

    Adv. MR. D MOZUMDER,MR. D MAZUMDAR,MR. D MAZUMDAR, ,MR. S BISWAS,MR C GOGOI,MR. D MAZUMDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 3 ORS. Advocate - SC, PNB

  2. 2.THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, FANCY BAZAR, BRANCH (

  3. 3.ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, FANCY BAZAR BRANCH (

  4. 4.THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CUM CIRCLE HEAD, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, CIRCLE OFFICE

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1810/2026 Sudip Paitya v. Punjab National Bank & Ors. Sudip Paitya sought temporary injunction to restrain Punjab National Bank from disturbing his possession of a 3 kathas 18 gondas plot of land (2nd RS Patta No. 27, Dag No. 113), which he claimed was never mortgaged to the bank. The trial court had dismissed his earlier injunction application, citing pending proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Justice Robin Phukan found a strong prima facie case in Paitya's favor, noting the bank arbitrarily affixed possession notices on unmortgaged property. The court granted temporary injunction, directing parties to maintain status quo until 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  2. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1810/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1810/2026 Sudip Paitya v. Punjab National Bank & Ors. Sudip Paitya sought temporary injunction to restrain Punjab National Bank from disturbing his possession of a 3 kathas 18 gondas plot of land (2nd RS Patta No. 27, Dag No. 113), which he claimed was never mortgaged to the bank. The trial court had dismissed his earlier injunction application, citing pending proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Justice Robin Phukan found a strong prima facie case in Paitya's favor, noting the bank arbitrarily affixed possession notices on unmortgaged property. The court granted temporary injunction, directing parties to maintain status quo until 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case