RITUPORNA CHANDA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, HEALTH AND F W — WP(C)/2773/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010103512026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5906/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2773/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10040 - Other service matters with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITUPORNA CHANDA

    Adv. MR A DASGUPTA,MR J K SHARMA,MR J K SHARMA, ,MS B DAS,MR. A R DAS,MR J K SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, HEALTH AND F W

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL-CUM-CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2773/2026 In this Gauhati High Court writ petition filed by Rituporna Chanda against the State of Assam and medical education authorities, the court heard arguments from both the petitioner's Senior Counsel and the Health Department's Standing Counsel on 29.05.2026. Justice Soumitra Saikia adjourned the matter for one week to allow the petitioner's counsel to complete his instructions, with no substantive order on the petition's merits rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2773/2026 In this Gauhati High Court writ petition filed by Rituporna Chanda against the State of Assam and medical education authorities, the court heard arguments from both the petitioner's Senior Counsel and the Health Department's Standing Counsel on 29.05.2026. Justice Soumitra Saikia adjourned the matter for one week to allow the petitioner's counsel to complete his instructions, with no substantive order on the petition's merits rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case