M/S KAUSHAL SHARMA vs NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — Arb.P./39/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section SEC. 11 (6). Status: - For Motion -. Next hearing: : -.

- For Motion - Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010103292026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

Arb.P./5893/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

Arb.P./39/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10247 - Arbitration Cases ( 237 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section SEC. 11 (6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S KAUSHAL SHARMA

    Adv. MR K L GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

  2. 2.GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY

  3. 3.DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, GATI - SHAKTI UNIT

  4. 4.SR. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: Arb.P./39/2026 M/S Kaushal Sharma filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Northeast Frontier Railway and three officials. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable within four weeks; notices were waived as the respondents' counsel accepted service. The court directed extra copies be furnished within one week and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Arb.P./39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Arb.P./39/2026 M/S Kaushal Sharma filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Northeast Frontier Railway and three officials. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable within four weeks; notices were waived as the respondents' counsel accepted service. The court directed extra copies be furnished within one week and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case