SRI RINTU KUMAR PEGU AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./851/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010103272026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./4434/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

Crl.Pet./851/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI RINTU KUMAR PEGU AND ANR

    Adv. MR B P BORAH,MR R YASIN,MR R YASIN, ,MD. A CHOUDHURY,MR R YASIN

  2. 2.SRI DIMBESWAR PEGU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

  2. 2.SMT DEPIKA KUTUM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Pet./851/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a criminal petition by Sri Rintu Kumar Pegu and Sri Dimbeswar Pegu against the State of Assam and Smt Depika Kutum on 15.06.2026. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia issued notice to both respondents; the State accepted notice informally while the petitioners were directed to serve notice on respondent No.2 by speed post. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./851/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Pet./851/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a criminal petition by Sri Rintu Kumar Pegu and Sri Dimbeswar Pegu against the State of Assam and Smt Depika Kutum on 15.06.2026. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia issued notice to both respondents; the State accepted notice informally while the petitioners were directed to serve notice on respondent No.2 by speed post. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case