MD NAZIR HUSSAIN LASKAR vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Advocate - SC, CUSTOMS — Crl.Rev.P./286/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010103222026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Rev.P./4430/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

Crl.Rev.P./286/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10261 - Criminal Revisions against orders passed in trial cases ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD NAZIR HUSSAIN LASKAR

    Adv. ALHAJJ I UDDIN,MRS. R MOMTAZ,MRS. R MOMTAZ, ,MR ROBIUL HOQUE,MRS. R MOMTAZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Advocate - SC, CUSTOMS

  2. 2.ABHIJIT KUMAR,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed MD Nazir Hussain Laskar's criminal revision petition, setting aside the Superintendent of CPF Badarpur's condition requiring 30% security deposit for release of a seized truck. The Court held that while the Superintendent has power to impose conditions under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, he cannot nullify a lawful court order, and the security deposit condition effectively negated the Chief Judicial Magistrate's earlier release order dated 08.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Rev.P./286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed MD Nazir Hussain Laskar's criminal revision petition, setting aside the Superintendent of CPF Badarpur's condition requiring 30% security deposit for release of a seized truck. The Court held that while the Superintendent has power to impose conditions under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, he cannot nullify a lawful court order, and the security deposit condition effectively negated the Chief Judicial Magistrate's earlier release order dated 08.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case