M/S GOGOI ENTERPRISE vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST — WP(C)/2831/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010103202026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5890/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2831/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10101 - Sales Tax ( 101 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S GOGOI ENTERPRISE

    Adv. MR. D SAHU,MR. R S MISHRA,MR. R S MISHRA, ,MS M GOGOI,MR. R S MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST

  2. 2.THE PR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND C.EXCISE, DIBRUGARH

  4. 4.THE ASSTT. COMMISIONER OF CGST - DIBRUGARH

  5. 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT,CGST

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2831/2026 M/S Gogoi Enterprise v. Union of India & Ors (Gauhati High Court, 03.06.2026) M/S Gogoi Enterprise, a Hero MotorCorp sub-dealer, challenged a GST recovery notice for Rs. 16,95,769/- alleging excess Input Tax Credit availed during December 2017-March 2018. The petitioner contended that parallel audit and demand proceedings were improperly initiated. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks and crucially granted interim relief: no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pending the next hearing, noting the audit was already completed and accepted by the petitioner on 18.06.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2831/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2831/2026 M/S Gogoi Enterprise v. Union of India & Ors (Gauhati High Court, 03.06.2026) M/S Gogoi Enterprise, a Hero MotorCorp sub-dealer, challenged a GST recovery notice for Rs. 16,95,769/- alleging excess Input Tax Credit availed during December 2017-March 2018. The petitioner contended that parallel audit and demand proceedings were improperly initiated. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks and crucially granted interim relief: no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pending the next hearing, noting the audit was already completed and accepted by the petitioner on 18.06.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case