AMIT DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/2799/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010103162026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5887/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2799/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10024 - Appointment on compassionate ground on non-educational matter. ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT DAS
Adv. MS. S B CHOUDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE
-
2.THE CHAIRMAN
-
3.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
4.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
-
5.THE SECRETARY
-
6.THE JOINT SECRETARY
-
7.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER
-
8.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
9.THE DIRECTOR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2799/2026 - Amit Das v. State of Assam In this writ petition, Amit Das challenged the rejection of his compassionate appointment application by the State Level Committee (SLC). Das contended that his claim was timely submitted but rejected on grounds that it exceeded 13 years, with authorities citing loss of "immediacy." The Gauhati High Court, on 01.06.2026, issued notice to all respondents returnable in four weeks, allowing respondent counsel time to obtain instructions on Das's core argument that a timely submission cannot be rejected as belated. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2799/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2799/2026 - Amit Das v. State of Assam In this writ petition, Amit Das challenged the rejection of his compassionate appointment application by the State Level Committee (SLC). Das contended that his claim was timely submitted but rejected on grounds that it exceeded 13 years, with authorities citing loss of "immediacy." The Gauhati High Court, on 01.06.2026, issued notice to all respondents returnable in four weeks, allowing respondent counsel time to obtain instructions on Das's core argument that a timely submission cannot be rejected as belated. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts