THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. vs DURGA TASHA AND 4 ORS. — MACApp./270/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SEC. 173. Status: Admission. Next hearing: : -.

Admission Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010103122026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

MACApp./5885/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

MACApp./270/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SEC. 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. MR SISHIR DUTTA,MS. M CHOUDHURY,MS. M CHOUDHURY, ,S K BEGUM,MS. M CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DURGA TASHA AND 4 ORS.

  2. 2.TUFAN TASHA

  3. 3.RAJU TASHA

  4. 4.BIDU TASHA

  5. 5.JONUS KARMAKAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: MACApp./270/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging a MACT Tribunal's judgment of 20.02.2026, which awarded Rs. 9,70,000 compensation plus 6% annual interest to the respondents (Durga Tasha and others). The court issued notice to respondents returnable in four weeks and called for records from the lower tribunal for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MACApp./270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACApp./270/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging a MACT Tribunal's judgment of 20.02.2026, which awarded Rs. 9,70,000 compensation plus 6% annual interest to the respondents (Durga Tasha and others). The court issued notice to respondents returnable in four weeks and called for records from the lower tribunal for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case