M/S KAUSHAL SHARMA vs NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — Arb.P./36/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section SEC. 11 (6). Status: - For Motion -. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010103072026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
Arb.P./5883/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
Arb.P./36/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10247 - Arbitration Cases ( 237 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S KAUSHAL SHARMA
Adv. MR K L GUPTA,MR KRISHNANGSHU B,MR KRISHNANGSHU B, ,MR KRISHNANGSHU B
Respondent(s)
-
1.NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I.
-
2.GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI
-
3.DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, GATI - SHAKTI UNIT
-
4.SR. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: Arb.P./36/2026 M/S Kaushal Sharma filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Northeast Frontier Railway and three other respondents. On 01.06.2026, Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice returnable within four weeks, with notices waived for all respondents who accepted service through their counsel. The petitioner was directed to furnish extra copies within one week, and the matter was adjourned for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Arb.P./36/2026
Case Summary: Arb.P./36/2026 M/S Kaushal Sharma filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Northeast Frontier Railway and three other respondents. On 01.06.2026, Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice returnable within four weeks, with notices waived for all respondents who accepted service through their counsel. The petitioner was directed to furnish extra copies within one week, and the matter was adjourned for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts