ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, A S E C,SC, P AND R.D.,FOR CAVEATOR,MR. D A KAIYUM — I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERIRULE10. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 03rd June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010102662026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5864/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE
Adv. MR. SURAJIT DAS, ,A MISHRA,MD A RAHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, A S E C,SC, P AND R.D.,FOR CAVEATOR,MR. D A KAIYUM
-
2.THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
-
3.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
4.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO)
-
5.THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
-
6.ASMA KHATUN
-
7.ROFIQUL ISLAM,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abu Bakkar Siiddique's interlocutory application to implead Sri Rofiqul Islam as respondent No. 7 in the connected writ petition challenging the rejection of an election petition against elected candidate Asma Khatun. The court granted the application because Rofiqul Islam was already a party to the original election petition and had filed a caveat, and the court had previously directed such impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abu Bakkar Siiddique's interlocutory application to implead Sri Rofiqul Islam as respondent No. 7 in the connected writ petition challenging the rejection of an election petition against elected candidate Asma Khatun. The court granted the application because Rofiqul Islam was already a party to the original election petition and had filed a caveat, and the court had previously directed such impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts