ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, A S E C,SC, P AND R.D.,FOR CAVEATOR,MR. D A KAIYUM — I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERIRULE10. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 03rd June 2026.

CNR: GAHC010102662026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5864/2026

Filing Date

22-05-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026

Registration Date

26-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

03rd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERIRULE10

Petitioner(s)

ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE

Adv. MR. SURAJIT DAS, ,A MISHRA,MD A RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, A S E C,SC, P AND R.D.,FOR CAVEATOR,MR. D A KAIYUM

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION

THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO)

THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER

ASMA KHATUN

ROFIQUL ISLAM,

Orders

03-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abu Bakkar Siiddique's interlocutory application to implead Sri Rofiqul Islam as respondent No. 7 in the connected writ petition challenging the rejection of an election petition against elected candidate Asma Khatun. The court granted the application because Rofiqul Islam was already a party to the original election petition and had filed a caveat, and the court had previously directed such impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Abu Bakkar Siiddique's interlocutory application to implead Sri Rofiqul Islam as respondent No. 7 in the connected writ petition challenging the rejection of an election petition against elected candidate Asma Khatun. The court granted the application because Rofiqul Islam was already a party to the original election petition and had filed a caveat, and the court had previously directed such impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Code of Civil Procedure All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case