SUTAN DAS @ DEBASISH DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/553/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section SEC. 430 (2). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010102632026
e-Filing Number
21-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/4399/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/553/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUTAN DAS @ DEBASISH DAS
Adv. MR P DAS,MR P PRAWAR,MR P PRAWAR, ,MR P PRAWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
-
2.SMTI RAJIA SAH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo,honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on an interlocutory application (I.A.) filed by Sutan Das seeking suspension of a POCSO conviction judgment dated 26.03.2026 pending appeal. The court directed the applicant to furnish appeal documents within two working days and ordered service of notice on the State and complainant through the jurisdictional police station. The matter was adjourned pending receipt of the trial court record, and respondents were permitted to file objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/553/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on an interlocutory application (I.A.) filed by Sutan Das seeking suspension of a POCSO conviction judgment dated 26.03.2026 pending appeal. The court directed the applicant to furnish appeal documents within two working days and ordered service of notice on the State and complainant through the jurisdictional police station. The matter was adjourned pending receipt of the trial court record, and respondents were permitted to file objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts