BHABA KANTA NATH vs CHINMOY PRAKASH PHOOKAN — Cont.Cas(C)/282/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12. Status: Motion. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010101832026

e-Filing Number

21-05-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/5814/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/282/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12
Constitution of India Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHABA KANTA NATH

    Adv. J SHARMA,MR. P THAKURIA,MR. P THAKURIA, ,ABHIJIT PATOR,MR. P THAKURIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHINMOY PRAKASH PHOOKAN

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Summary: In this contempt of court case, petitioner Bhaba Kanta Nath alleged willful violation of a prior court order dated 14-02-2025 by respondent Chinmoy Prakash Phookan (GMC Commissioner). The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in 4 weeks, directed the petitioner to serve notice by speed post within 3 working days, dispensed with the respondent's personal appearance at this stage, and adjourned the matter for listing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this contempt of court case, petitioner Bhaba Kanta Nath alleged willful violation of a prior court order dated 14-02-2025 by respondent Chinmoy Prakash Phookan (GMC Commissioner). The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in 4 weeks, directed the petitioner to serve notice by speed post within 3 working days, dispensed with the respondent's personal appearance at this stage, and adjourned the matter for listing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case