SRI BHUSHAN CHANDRA DEKA vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, CGST — WP(C)/2730/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010101592026
e-Filing Number
21-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5800/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2730/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI BHUSHAN CHANDRA DEKA
Adv. MR. R S MISHRA,MS. M DEY,MS. M DEY, ,MS B SARMA,MS. M DEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, CGST
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
-
4.THE JURISDICTION OFFICER SUPERINTENDENT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 2730/2026 Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed the writ petition and directed the GST authorities to consider restoring the petitioner's GST registration if he files an application within 60 days and complies with Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 by submitting all pending returns and paying outstanding tax dues with interest and late fees. Key Reasoning: The court found the case identical to the precedent *Dhirghat Hardware Stores*, where registration was cancelled for non-filing of returns for 6 months due to health issues. Under the proviso to Rule 22(4), if the assessee furnishes pending returns and makes full tax payment, authorities must drop proceedings and restore registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2730/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 2730/2026 Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed the writ petition and directed the GST authorities to consider restoring the petitioner's GST registration if he files an application within 60 days and complies with Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 by submitting all pending returns and paying outstanding tax dues with interest and late fees. Key Reasoning: The court found the case identical to the precedent *Dhirghat Hardware Stores*, where registration was cancelled for non-filing of returns for 6 months due to health issues. Under the proviso to Rule 22(4), if the assessee furnishes pending returns and makes full tax payment, authorities must drop proceedings and restore registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts