T F B (INDIA), vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION — WP(C)/2761/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010101582026
e-Filing Number
21-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5799/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2761/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.T F B (INDIA),
Adv. MR. R S MISHRA,MS. M DEY,MS. M DEY, ,MS B SARMA,MS. M DEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
29-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2761/2026 - T F B (INDIA) v. The State of Assam The case was adjourned to 08.06.2026 for further hearing. The petitioner (a partnership firm) challenged GST proceedings where a Summary Show Cause Notice was issued without a proper initial Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act for FY 2017-2018. The respondents raised maintainability objections and sought time for instructions. The court granted an interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner pending the next hearing and directed counsel to exchange copies of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2761/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2761/2026 - T F B (INDIA) v. The State of Assam The case was adjourned to 08.06.2026 for further hearing. The petitioner (a partnership firm) challenged GST proceedings where a Summary Show Cause Notice was issued without a proper initial Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act for FY 2017-2018. The respondents raised maintainability objections and sought time for instructions. The court granted an interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner pending the next hearing and directed counsel to exchange copies of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts