125050893 HEAD CONSTABLE (MINISTERIAL) DINESH KUMAR vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WP(C)/2778/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010101402026
e-Filing Number
20-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5788/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2778/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10060 - Other service matters with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities a ( 60 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.125050893 HEAD CONSTABLE (MINISTERIAL) DINESH KUMAR
Adv. MR. T DEURI,U BHARADWAJ,U BHARADWAJ, ,MRS. R S DEURI,MR U SAIKIA,MS. L WANGSA,U BHARADWAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.
-
2.THE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
-
3.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
5.THE COMMANDANT
-
6.THE COMMANDANT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) /2778/2026 On 01.06.2026, the Gauhati High Court heard the writ petition filed by Head Constable Dinesh Kumar against the Union of India and CRPF authorities. Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice to all respondents returnable within four weeks; however, since the learned CGC accepted notice on behalf of all respondents, formal notices were waived. The petitioner was directed to furnish extra copies within one week. The case is adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2778/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) /2778/2026 On 01.06.2026, the Gauhati High Court heard the writ petition filed by Head Constable Dinesh Kumar against the Union of India and CRPF authorities. Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice to all respondents returnable within four weeks; however, since the learned CGC accepted notice on behalf of all respondents, formal notices were waived. The petitioner was directed to furnish extra copies within one week. The case is adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts