THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. vs SMT. HUNMONI CHUTIA AND 4 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/1765/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: GAHC010101382026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

21-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5786/2026

Filing Date

21-05-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1765/2026

Registration Date

27-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

Adv. MR H GUPTA

THE N.F. RAILWAY

THE CHIEF ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION, (CON), N.F. RAILWAY

THE DY. CE/CON/WORKS/ BOGIBEEL BRIDGE PROJECT, N.F. RAILWAY

THE DY. CE/CON-2/WORKS, N.F. RAILWAY

Respondent(s)

SMT. HUNMONI CHUTIA AND 4 ORS.

SMT. SIKHA BORGOHAIN

SMT. PUJA BORGOHAIN

SMT. PRERNA BORGOHAIN

ABHIJIT BORGOHAIN

Orders

01-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1765/2026 The Gauhati High Court, on 01.06.2026, heard an interlocutory application by the Union of India and N.F. Railway officials seeking condonation of 33 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment dated 30.01.2024 from Money Suit No. 37/2012. Justice Robin Phukan issued notice to the respondents (family of late Anil Borgohain) returnable in four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1765/2026 The Gauhati High Court, on 01.06.2026, heard an interlocutory application by the Union of India and N.F. Railway officials seeking condonation of 33 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment dated 30.01.2024 from Money Suit No. 37/2012. Justice Robin Phukan issued notice to the respondents (family of late Anil Borgohain) returnable in four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case