SRI DINAMANI HALOI vs SRI AKASH DEEP Advocate - SC, BTC 1. — I.A.(Civil)/1729/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010101312026

e-Filing Number

21-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5781/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1729/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI DINAMANI HALOI

    Adv. MR. N HAQUE, ,MR. S R BARBHUIYA,MR. A K AZAD,MR M HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI AKASH DEEP Advocate - SC, BTC 1.

  2. 2.MUKESH SAHU

  3. 3.BHASKAR JYOTI RAJBONGSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court granted Sri Dinamani Haloi's interlocutory application to implead Mukesh Sahu, the current Principal Secretary of BTC, as Respondent No. 3 in the connected Contempt Petition (Cont.Case(C) No. 158/2025). The court found Sahu to be a necessary and proper party who would now be responsible for complying with directions issued in WP(C) No. 6125/2023 dated 21.08.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1729/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court granted Sri Dinamani Haloi's interlocutory application to implead Mukesh Sahu, the current Principal Secretary of BTC, as Respondent No. 3 in the connected Contempt Petition (Cont.Case(C) No. 158/2025). The court found Sahu to be a necessary and proper party who would now be responsible for complying with directions issued in WP(C) No. 6125/2023 dated 21.08.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case