SH. G. KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, UPSC — WP(C)/2805/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010101242026

e-Filing Number

20-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5778/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2805/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10055 - Compulsory retirement with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities a ( 55 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SH. G. KUMAR

    Adv. MS. T SOM,MS. A MAHANTA,MS. A MAHANTA, ,MR. U HAZARIKA,R K SHARMA,MS. A MAHANTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, UPSC

  2. 2.CENTRAL ARMED POLICE FORCE (CAPF)

  3. 3.UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2805/2026 G. Kumar v. Union of India & Ors - Gauhati High Court (29.05.2026) The court disposed of the writ petition filed by a CRPF Commandant challenging disciplinary proceedings recommending his compulsory retirement. Justice Soumitra Saikia directed that the petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2026 must be duly considered by the disciplinary authority (CRPF) before implementing the UPSC's recommendation for major penalty, requiring completion within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2805/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2805/2026 G. Kumar v. Union of India & Ors - Gauhati High Court (29.05.2026) The court disposed of the writ petition filed by a CRPF Commandant challenging disciplinary proceedings recommending his compulsory retirement. Justice Soumitra Saikia directed that the petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2026 must be duly considered by the disciplinary authority (CRPF) before implementing the UPSC's recommendation for major penalty, requiring completion within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case