SRI SUSHIL RANJAN DEY vs SMTI BHAGWATI DEVI KHEMANI AND 4 ORS — I.A.(Civil)/1535/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010100802022
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/6277/2022
Filing Date
24-May-2022
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1535/2022
Registration Date
26-May-2022
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI SUSHIL RANJAN DEY
Adv. MR. P J SAIKIA, SR. ADV,MR. A K GUPTA,MR. A K GUPTA, ,MR K J SAIKIA,MR. A K GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMTI BHAGWATI DEVI KHEMANI AND 4 ORS
-
2.SRI LAKHI PRASAD KHEMANI
-
3.SRI RAMESH KUMAR KHEMANI
-
4.SRI SURENDRA KUMAR KHEMANI
-
5.SRI NARENDRA KUMAR KHEMANI
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: I.A.(Civil)/1535/2022 Case: Sushil Ranjan Dey v. Smti Bhagwati Devi Khemani & 4 Others Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The matter was re-listed for hearing on 29.05.2026 as requested by petitioner's counsel, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2025
Orders
Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria
-
02-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
21-Feb-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
-
26-Apr-2024
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
-
15-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1535/2022
CASE SUMMARY: I.A.(Civil)/1535/2022 Case: Sushil Ranjan Dey v. Smti Bhagwati Devi Khemani & 4 Others Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The matter was re-listed for hearing on 29.05.2026 as requested by petitioner's counsel, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts