ON THE DEATH OF GAURI KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT PRATIMA KALITA vs BISWADEEP DAS Advocate - SC, P H E — I.A.(Civil)/1790/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010100722026
e-Filing Number
20-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5760/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1790/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ON THE DEATH OF GAURI KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT PRATIMA KALITA
Adv. B. NATH
-
2.SRI PRANJIT KALITA
Adv. BUDHINDRA NATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.BISWADEEP DAS Advocate - SC, P H E
-
2.DIPTENDU TALUKDAR
-
3.DIGANTA BARUAH
-
4.JAYANTA MAZUMDAR
-
5.DIGANTA BARUAH
-
6.DIBYAJOTY DUARAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1790/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed the legal heirs of deceased petitioner Gauri Kalita to substitute him in a contempt petition against Public Health Engineering Department officials. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi condoned a 77-day delay in filing the substitution application and set aside the abatement, as the original petitioner had died pending the contempt case for non-compliance with a court order. The respondents did not oppose the relief and informed the court that steps were being taken for payment compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1790/2026
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1790/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed the legal heirs of deceased petitioner Gauri Kalita to substitute him in a contempt petition against Public Health Engineering Department officials. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi condoned a 77-day delay in filing the substitution application and set aside the abatement, as the original petitioner had died pending the contempt case for non-compliance with a court order. The respondents did not oppose the relief and informed the court that steps were being taken for payment compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts