SRI RAJIB DOWERAH vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WP(C)/2792/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010100092026

e-Filing Number

20-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5721/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2792/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10034 - Major punishment with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 34 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI RAJIB DOWERAH

    Adv. MR. D P BORAH,MR U GHOSH,MR U GHOSH, ,MR U GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL (EASTERN COMMAND)

  4. 4.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAW OFFICER/ DIG

  5. 5.THE COMMANDANT

  6. 6.SRI SHANKAR BAHADURE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2792/2026 Sri Rajib Dowerah v. The Union of India & 5 Others The Gauhati High Court issued a notice in this writ petition on 01.06.2026. The court fixed a returnable date of four weeks and waived formal notices for Respondents 1-5 after their counsel accepted service. The court deferred the question of maintainability regarding the petition's jurisdiction to be decided later and adjourned the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2792/2026 Sri Rajib Dowerah v. The Union of India & 5 Others The Gauhati High Court issued a notice in this writ petition on 01.06.2026. The court fixed a returnable date of four weeks and waived formal notices for Respondents 1-5 after their counsel accepted service. The court deferred the question of maintainability regarding the petition's jurisdiction to be decided later and adjourned the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case