NOOR SAHANARA BEGUM BARBHUIYA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU — I.A.(Civil)/1728/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010099932026
e-Filing Number
19-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5713/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1728/2026
Registration Date
25-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NOOR SAHANARA BEGUM BARBHUIYA
Adv. MR. S B LASKAR, ,MS D DUTTA,MR. H A LASKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
NOOR JAHANARA BARBHUIYA
Orders
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed the interlocutory application of Noor Sahanara Begum Barbhuiya to implead Noor Jahanara Barbhuiya as Respondent No. 6 in the related writ petition WP(C) No. 1210/2026. The petitioner had inadvertently omitted to implead Noor Jahanara Barbhuiya, who was a necessary party to the proceedings as she had previously filed WP(C) No. 863/2024 concerning related service and accommodation matters. Since the respondent state did not object, the court granted the prayer under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed the interlocutory application of Noor Sahanara Begum Barbhuiya to implead Noor Jahanara Barbhuiya as Respondent No. 6 in the related writ petition WP(C) No. 1210/2026. The petitioner had inadvertently omitted to implead Noor Jahanara Barbhuiya, who was a necessary party to the proceedings as she had previously filed WP(C) No. 863/2024 concerning related service and accommodation matters. Since the respondent state did not object, the court granted the prayer under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts