NARAYAN RAJBONSHI vs RABIN BORO — I.A.(Civil)/1823/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.

Orders Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010098872026

e-Filing Number

18-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5646/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1823/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYAN RAJBONSHI

    Adv. MR. A KABRA,MS S GUPTA,MS S GUPTA, ,MS S GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RABIN BORO

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1823/2026 Narayan Rajbonshi v. Rabin Boro Petitioner Narayan Rajbonshi filed an interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 189 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a Civil Judge's order dated 18.08.2025 in the underlying suit. Justice Robin Phukan issued notice to the respondent returnable within four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1823/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1823/2026 Narayan Rajbonshi v. Rabin Boro Petitioner Narayan Rajbonshi filed an interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 189 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a Civil Judge's order dated 18.08.2025 in the underlying suit. Justice Robin Phukan issued notice to the respondent returnable within four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case