KIRANSHREE HOTELS PVT LTD vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION — WP(C)/2899/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
CNR: GAHC010098502026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5621/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2899/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KIRANSHREE HOTELS PVT LTD
Adv. DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR P BARUAH, ,MR. A. KAUSHIK,B SARMA,MR P K BORA,MR S J SAIKIA,MR. N N DUTTA,MR P BARUAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION
-
2.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
-
3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jul-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2899/2026 Kiranshree Hotels Pvt Ltd challenged a CGST Assessment Order dated 10.04.2026, alleging the officer lacked jurisdiction to assess on a "best judgment" basis. The Gauhati High Court adjourned the case to 24.07.2026 for substantive hearing. Pending adjudication, the court directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner, relying on a similar interim order granted in an identically situated case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2899/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2899/2026 Kiranshree Hotels Pvt Ltd challenged a CGST Assessment Order dated 10.04.2026, alleging the officer lacked jurisdiction to assess on a "best judgment" basis. The Gauhati High Court adjourned the case to 24.07.2026 for substantive hearing. Pending adjudication, the court directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner, relying on a similar interim order granted in an identically situated case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts