VINAY PRAKASH DHAKA vs BANK OF INDIA AND ORS — WP(C)/2646/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010097672026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5576/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2646/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10050 - Transfer with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities and Institutio ( 50 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINAY PRAKASH DHAKA
Adv. MR H K DAS,MR B DEKA,MR B DEKA, ,MS D TALUKDAR,MR N K SARMA,MR B DEKA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
-
2.THE GENERAL MANAGER
-
3.THE CHIEF MANAGER
-
4.THE ZONAL MANAGER
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
- For Motion -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2646/2026 - Vinay Prakash Dhaka v. Bank of India Vinay Prakash Dhaka, a Manager Law (Scale-II) at Bank of India's Guwahati Zonal Office, challenged his transfer order to Chandigarh ARB Zone. He contended that Bank of India's transfer policy entitled North East-transferred officers to provide choice postings after tenure completion, and that Clause 6.5.2 required consideration of choice postings for re-transfers to home zones. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim relief staying the impugned transfer order pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2646/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2646/2026 - Vinay Prakash Dhaka v. Bank of India Vinay Prakash Dhaka, a Manager Law (Scale-II) at Bank of India's Guwahati Zonal Office, challenged his transfer order to Chandigarh ARB Zone. He contended that Bank of India's transfer policy entitled North East-transferred officers to provide choice postings after tenure completion, and that Clause 6.5.2 required consideration of choice postings for re-transfers to home zones. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim relief staying the impugned transfer order pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts