BIPIN KUMAR AND ANR. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.A./171/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(2). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 28th April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010097472023
Filing Number
Crl.A./4632/2023
Filing Date
06-May-2023
Registration No
Crl.A./171/2023
Registration Date
20-May-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10253 - Appeals against conviction under other Acts. ( 215 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIPIN KUMAR AND ANR.
Adv. M PATHAK,S DAS,S DAS, ,MR. P K DAS,MS. S DAS
-
2.VIRA MAHATO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.A./171/2023 - Bipin Kumar and Anr. v. The State of Assam The Gauhati High Court partially allowed the appellants' appeals against their conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) NDPS Act for commercial quantity drug possession. While affirming that all three appellants were in conscious possession of cannabis seized from their respective luggage on a train, the court found insufficient evidence they jointly possessed the total 21.1 kgs. The court downgraded convictions to Section 20(b)(ii)(B) (non-commercial quantity), reducing sentences from 15 years to 3½ years imprisonment with Rs. 1 lakh fine each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das
-
16-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das
-
19-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
03-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria
-
16-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
02-Sep-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury,honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali ThakuriaView PDF
-
26-Sep-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
30-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri NandiView PDF
-
04-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
27-Jun-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri NandiView PDF
-
24-May-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
06-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A./171/2023
Case Summary: Crl.A./171/2023 - Bipin Kumar and Anr. v. The State of Assam The Gauhati High Court partially allowed the appellants' appeals against their conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) NDPS Act for commercial quantity drug possession. While affirming that all three appellants were in conscious possession of cannabis seized from their respective luggage on a train, the court found insufficient evidence they jointly possessed the total 21.1 kgs. The court downgraded convictions to Section 20(b)(ii)(B) (non-commercial quantity), reducing sentences from 15 years to 3½ years imprisonment with Rs. 1 lakh fine each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts