M/S MAA KAMAKHYA TRADERS AND ANR vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, CGST — WP(C)/2880/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010097202026

e-Filing Number

15-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5542/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2880/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MAA KAMAKHYA TRADERS AND ANR

    Adv. MS. M L GOPE,MS. N HAWELIA,MS. N HAWELIA, ,MS S SARKAR,MR S K SAHA,MS. N HAWELIA

  2. 2.SMT. ASHADEVI DINANATH MAURYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, CGST

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT,

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2880/2026 The Gauhati High Court (Justice Kardak Ete) admitted a writ petition by Maa Kamakhya Traders challenging a GST demand of Rs 21,49,922 levied by the Superintendent, CGST Range-IF Guwahati. The petition also challenges the appellate order dated 13.03.2026 upholding the demand. The court issued notice returnable in 4 weeks and, finding prima facie that the Superintendent, Dhubri Range lacked jurisdiction per circulars dated 09.02.2018 and 27.10.2025, stayed all coercive action against the petitioner pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2880/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2880/2026 The Gauhati High Court (Justice Kardak Ete) admitted a writ petition by Maa Kamakhya Traders challenging a GST demand of Rs 21,49,922 levied by the Superintendent, CGST Range-IF Guwahati. The petition also challenges the appellate order dated 13.03.2026 upholding the demand. The court issued notice returnable in 4 weeks and, finding prima facie that the Superintendent, Dhubri Range lacked jurisdiction per circulars dated 09.02.2018 and 27.10.2025, stayed all coercive action against the petitioner pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case