ABDUL MAZID BARBHUIYA vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM,SC, PWD,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/2785/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010096802026

e-Filing Number

15-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5512/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2785/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10151 - Acquisition of land. ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL MAZID BARBHUIYA

    Adv. MR. A Y CHOUDHURY,MR. AHMAD SAKIR,MR. AHMAD SAKIR, ,MR. T A CHOUDHURY,MR. AHMAD SAKIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM,SC, PWD,SC, REVENUE

  2. 2.THE STATE OF ASSAM

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (P)

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, HAILAKANDI

  5. 5.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, HAILAKANDI

  6. 6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Summary of WP(C)/2785/2026 Case: Abdul Mazid Barbhuiya v. The Union of India & 5 Ors (Gauhati High Court) Order (01.06.2026): The case has been adjourned for one week. Petitioner's counsel requested postponement citing certain developments in the matter and to obtain further instructions. The court granted the adjournment to allow the learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain necessary instructions before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2785/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(C)/2785/2026 Case: Abdul Mazid Barbhuiya v. The Union of India & 5 Ors (Gauhati High Court) Order (01.06.2026): The case has been adjourned for one week. Petitioner's counsel requested postponement citing certain developments in the matter and to obtain further instructions. The court granted the adjournment to allow the learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain necessary instructions before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case