M/S MAA KARNI TRADERS AND ANR vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST — WP(C)/2864/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010095992026

e-Filing Number

14-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5461/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2864/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MAA KARNI TRADERS AND ANR

    Adv. MS. M L GOPE,MS. N HAWELIA,MS. N HAWELIA, ,MS S SARKAR,MR S K SAHA,MS. N HAWELIA

  2. 2.SRI TRILOKNATH SHIVKARAN MAURYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT,

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2864/2026 Outcome: The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim relief. The court found prima facie that the Superintendent, Dhubri Range lacks competent authority under GST Circulars dated 09.02.2018 and 27.10.2025, and accordingly stayed all coercive action against the petitioner until the returnable date. The case challenges a GST demand of Rs. 31,48,488/- levied through orders dated 08.12.2025 and 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2864/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2864/2026 Outcome: The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim relief. The court found prima facie that the Superintendent, Dhubri Range lacks competent authority under GST Circulars dated 09.02.2018 and 27.10.2025, and accordingly stayed all coercive action against the petitioner until the returnable date. The case challenges a GST demand of Rs. 31,48,488/- levied through orders dated 08.12.2025 and 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case