SAIFUL ISLAM vs MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS. — Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12. Status: Motion. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010095452026
e-Filing Number
14-05-2026
Filing Number
Cont.Cas(C)/5429/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026
Registration Date
16-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAIFUL ISLAM
Adv. MR. I H SAIKIA,MR. L M RAHMAN,MR. L M RAHMAN, ,MR K KASHYAB,MR. L M RAHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS.
-
2.ROHAN KUMAR JHA, IAS
-
3.SAMEER CHOUHDURY, ALRS
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026 Saiful Islam filed a contempt petition against government officials (Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS; Rohan Kumar Jha, IAS; and Sameer Choudhury, ALRS) alleging non-compliance with a court order dated 26.08.2025. The earlier order required the Designated Public Servant to pass a speaking and reasoned order within 45 days; however, despite the notice being acknowledged on 03.10.2025, no such order was issued within the prescribed period. Order: Notice issued, returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner directed to serve notice upon respondents by speed post within 2 working days. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026 Saiful Islam filed a contempt petition against government officials (Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS; Rohan Kumar Jha, IAS; and Sameer Choudhury, ALRS) alleging non-compliance with a court order dated 26.08.2025. The earlier order required the Designated Public Servant to pass a speaking and reasoned order within 45 days; however, despite the notice being acknowledged on 03.10.2025, no such order was issued within the prescribed period. Order: Notice issued, returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner directed to serve notice upon respondents by speed post within 2 working days. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts