SAIFUL ISLAM vs MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS. — Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

CNR: GAHC010095452026

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-05-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/5429/2026

Filing Date

14-05-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026

Registration Date

16-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12
Constitution of India Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

SAIFUL ISLAM

Adv. MR. I H SAIKIA,MR. L M RAHMAN,MR. L M RAHMAN, ,MR K KASHYAB,MR. L M RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS.

ROHAN KUMAR JHA, IAS

SAMEER CHOUHDURY, ALRS

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

22-06-2026

MOTION

Orders

20-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026 Saiful Islam filed a contempt petition against government officials (Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS; Rohan Kumar Jha, IAS; and Sameer Choudhury, ALRS) alleging non-compliance with a court order dated 26.08.2025. The earlier order required the Designated Public Servant to pass a speaking and reasoned order within 45 days; however, despite the notice being acknowledged on 03.10.2025, no such order was issued within the prescribed period. Order: Notice issued, returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner directed to serve notice upon respondents by speed post within 2 working days. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/254/2026 Saiful Islam filed a contempt petition against government officials (Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS; Rohan Kumar Jha, IAS; and Sameer Choudhury, ALRS) alleging non-compliance with a court order dated 26.08.2025. The earlier order required the Designated Public Servant to pass a speaking and reasoned order within 45 days; however, despite the notice being acknowledged on 03.10.2025, no such order was issued within the prescribed period. Order: Notice issued, returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner directed to serve notice upon respondents by speed post within 2 working days. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case