THE CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION vs BHUPENDRA GOSWAMI AND ANR Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,FOR CAVEATOR,MR S SARMA — WP(C)/3092/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.

Next hearing 10-Sep-2026

CNR: GAHC010094752026

e-Filing Number

13-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5387/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3092/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10057 - Order of the Appellate or Revisional authority with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION

    Adv. MR. S C KEYAL,KAUSHIK JAIN,KAUSHIK JAIN, ,KAUSHIK JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRA GOSWAMI AND ANR Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,FOR CAVEATOR,MR S SARMA

  2. 2.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. 10-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Sep-2026

    - For Fresh Admission With Stay/Bail -

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief Justice,honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF

    Summary of WP(C)/3092/2026 - AICTE v. Bhupendra Goswami The Gauhati High Court adjourned the case to 10.09.2024 after hearing arguments on the AICTE's challenge to a Central Administrative Tribunal order directing service credit for gap periods and arrear salary payment to former NTMIS scheme employees. The court sought clarifications from both parties: whether AICTE would accept counting the gap period (01.04.2013-26.02.2019) for pensionary benefits only, and whether respondents would settle for pension credit without salary arrears, given the "no work, no pay" principle and that the subsequent appointments were under a different scheme post-closure of NTMIS in March 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3092/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(C)/3092/2026 - AICTE v. Bhupendra Goswami The Gauhati High Court adjourned the case to 10.09.2024 after hearing arguments on the AICTE's challenge to a Central Administrative Tribunal order directing service credit for gap periods and arrear salary payment to former NTMIS scheme employees. The court sought clarifications from both parties: whether AICTE would accept counting the gap period (01.04.2013-26.02.2019) for pensionary benefits only, and whether respondents would settle for pension credit without salary arrears, given the "no work, no pay" principle and that the subsequent appointments were under a different scheme post-closure of NTMIS in March 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case