MOHAR ALI vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/523/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010093742026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/4045/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/523/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAR ALI

    Adv. MR A NATH,MS. T P THANCHUNG,MS. T P THANCHUNG, ,DR ANKIT TODI,MS. R JUGLI,MS M PARBIN,PRIYANKA DAS,MS. T P THANCHUNG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

  2. 2.MD. NAIB ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court granted Mohar Ali's application for condonation of 166 days delay in filing an appeal against his conviction under Section 4 of the POCSO Act read with Section 448 IPC. The Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection to the delay being condoned, and the court accepted this submission, ordering the registry to register the connected appeal and list it for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/523/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court granted Mohar Ali's application for condonation of 166 days delay in filing an appeal against his conviction under Section 4 of the POCSO Act read with Section 448 IPC. The Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection to the delay being condoned, and the court accepted this submission, ordering the registry to register the connected appeal and list it for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case