SAYED ALI AND ORS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./519/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010092292025
e-Filing Number
29-04-2025
Filing Number
Crl.Pet./3949/2025
Filing Date
30-Apr-2025
Registration No
Crl.Pet./519/2025
Registration Date
02-May-2025
Judge
Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
Coram
Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAYED ALI AND ORS
Adv. MR. S AHMED,MR M RAHMAN,MR M RAHMAN, ,T UDDIN,MR M RAHMAN
-
2.AISHA KHATUN
-
3.NUR ISLAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./519/2025 Decision: The Gauhati High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings (PRC Case No. 38/2023) against Sayed Ali under IPC Sections 279/304(A) for a fatal motorcycle accident that killed Anes Ali. Key Reasoning: The court found that since both the informant (victim's father, Nur Islam) and the victim's mother (Aisha Khatun) jointly sought quashing and refused to proceed, continuing the case would constitute abuse of judicial process. With the parties amicably settled and conviction appearing remote, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings, as the case involved a civil-flavored dispute rather than a serious offence affecting public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
-
30-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Pet./519/2025
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./519/2025 Decision: The Gauhati High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings (PRC Case No. 38/2023) against Sayed Ali under IPC Sections 279/304(A) for a fatal motorcycle accident that killed Anes Ali. Key Reasoning: The court found that since both the informant (victim's father, Nur Islam) and the victim's mother (Aisha Khatun) jointly sought quashing and refused to proceed, continuing the case would constitute abuse of judicial process. With the parties amicably settled and conviction appearing remote, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings, as the case involved a civil-flavored dispute rather than a serious offence affecting public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts