UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs ENAMUL HOQUE AND ANR — I.A.(Civil)/1627/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.

Orders Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010092112026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5240/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1627/2026

Registration Date

16-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. MR T KALITA,MR. A KAKATI,MR. A KAKATI, ,MR. A KAKATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ENAMUL HOQUE AND ANR

  2. 2.TAZMUL HOQUE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: In I.A.(Civil)/1627/2026 before the Gauhati High Court, United India Insurance Company Limited filed an interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 79-day delay in preferring the connected MFA. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, issued notice to respondents Enamul Hoque and Tazmul Hoque. The petitioner was directed to serve notice by speed post and ordinary mail within seven days, returnable after four weeks, with the case listed accordingly for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1627/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In I.A.(Civil)/1627/2026 before the Gauhati High Court, United India Insurance Company Limited filed an interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 79-day delay in preferring the connected MFA. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, issued notice to respondents Enamul Hoque and Tazmul Hoque. The petitioner was directed to serve notice by speed post and ordinary mail within seven days, returnable after four weeks, with the case listed accordingly for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case