UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs MD ABDUL KAYUM CHOUDHURY @ ABDULQUAYYUM AND ANR. — I.A.(Civil)/1626/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010089362026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5090/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1626/2026
Registration Date
16-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. L DEKA,MR. N BARDOLOI,MR. N BARDOLOI, ,MR. M DUTTA,POOJA ROY,MR. N BARDOLOI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MD ABDUL KAYUM CHOUDHURY @ ABDULQUAYYUM AND ANR.
-
2.HARAN KUMAR PAUL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court heard an interlocutory application (I.A./1626/2026) filed by United India Insurance Company Limited seeking to condone a 252-day delay in preferring a connected Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) appeal. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita issued notice to respondents Md Abdul Kayum Choudhury and Haran Kumar Paul, directing the applicant to serve notice via speed post and usual mode within seven days, returnable after four weeks. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1626/2026
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court heard an interlocutory application (I.A./1626/2026) filed by United India Insurance Company Limited seeking to condone a 252-day delay in preferring a connected Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) appeal. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita issued notice to respondents Md Abdul Kayum Choudhury and Haran Kumar Paul, directing the applicant to serve notice via speed post and usual mode within seven days, returnable after four weeks. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts