MS HASINA BEGUM TALUKDAR AND ANR. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, P AND R.D. — Review.Pet./80/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010089162026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

Review.Pet./5078/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

Review.Pet./80/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10237 - Writ Appeals under the Gauhati High Court Rules. ( 204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS HASINA BEGUM TALUKDAR AND ANR.

    Adv. MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY

  2. 2.SUMIT CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, P AND R.D.

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  5. 5.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR

  6. 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

  7. 7.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

  8. 8.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the review petition filed by Block MIS Managers Ms. Hasina Begum Talukdar and Sumit Chakraborty against the State of Assam. The petitioners sought to review an order from February 6, 2026, which had dismissed their earlier writ petitions for non-prosecution. Justice Kardak Ete held that a review petition is not the appropriate remedy for proceedings dismissed for non-prosecution; instead, the proper recourse is to file an application for restoration or recall of the dismissal order. The court dismissed the review petition as not maintainable but granted liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate restoration/recall application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Review.Pet./80/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the review petition filed by Block MIS Managers Ms. Hasina Begum Talukdar and Sumit Chakraborty against the State of Assam. The petitioners sought to review an order from February 6, 2026, which had dismissed their earlier writ petitions for non-prosecution. Justice Kardak Ete held that a review petition is not the appropriate remedy for proceedings dismissed for non-prosecution; instead, the proper recourse is to file an application for restoration or recall of the dismissal order. The court dismissed the review petition as not maintainable but granted liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate restoration/recall application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case