ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI @ ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI vs TELIACHAPORITOOP DALANGPAR JAME MASJID COMMITTEE Advocate - G BORO, ,MR. S A HUSSAIN,MR D J HALOI — I.A.(Civil)/1464/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010088762026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/5057/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1464/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI @ ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI
Adv. MR. M S ALAM,MR S.MITRA,MR S.MITRA, ,MD. S ALOM,MR. P K DEKA,MR. R. KARIM,MR. I H LASKAR,MR. S MITRA,MR A K BORO,N CHAUDHURY,MR S.MITRA
Respondent(s)
TELIACHAPORITOOP DALANGPAR JAME MASJID COMMITTEE Advocate - G BORO, ,MR. S A HUSSAIN,MR D J HALOI
Orders
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted Abdul Karim Bakshi's application for stay of execution proceedings in Title Execution No. 16/2025. The Court held that since a connected Second Appeal (RSA) challenging the trial and appellate court judgments had been admitted upon formulation of substantial questions of law, continuing execution would cause irreversible prejudice to the applicant's possession of the disputed land and render the appeal nugatory. The Court stayed all execution proceedings, including attachment operations, pending final disposal of the RSA, maintaining status quo to preserve the subject matter of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted Abdul Karim Bakshi's application for stay of execution proceedings in Title Execution No. 16/2025. The Court held that since a connected Second Appeal (RSA) challenging the trial and appellate court judgments had been admitted upon formulation of substantial questions of law, continuing execution would cause irreversible prejudice to the applicant's possession of the disputed land and render the appeal nugatory. The Court stayed all execution proceedings, including attachment operations, pending final disposal of the RSA, maintaining status quo to preserve the subject matter of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts