ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI @ ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI vs TELIACHAPORITOOP DALANGPAR JAME MASJID COMMITTEE Advocate - G BORO, ,MR. S A HUSSAIN,MR D J HALOI — I.A.(Civil)/1464/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010088762026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/5057/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1464/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI @ ABDUL KARIM BAKSHI

Adv. MR. M S ALAM,MR S.MITRA,MR S.MITRA, ,MD. S ALOM,MR. P K DEKA,MR. R. KARIM,MR. I H LASKAR,MR. S MITRA,MR A K BORO,N CHAUDHURY,MR S.MITRA

Respondent(s)

TELIACHAPORITOOP DALANGPAR JAME MASJID COMMITTEE Advocate - G BORO, ,MR. S A HUSSAIN,MR D J HALOI

Orders

07-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted Abdul Karim Bakshi's application for stay of execution proceedings in Title Execution No. 16/2025. The Court held that since a connected Second Appeal (RSA) challenging the trial and appellate court judgments had been admitted upon formulation of substantial questions of law, continuing execution would cause irreversible prejudice to the applicant's possession of the disputed land and render the appeal nugatory. The Court stayed all execution proceedings, including attachment operations, pending final disposal of the RSA, maintaining status quo to preserve the subject matter of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted Abdul Karim Bakshi's application for stay of execution proceedings in Title Execution No. 16/2025. The Court held that since a connected Second Appeal (RSA) challenging the trial and appellate court judgments had been admitted upon formulation of substantial questions of law, continuing execution would cause irreversible prejudice to the applicant's possession of the disputed land and render the appeal nugatory. The Court stayed all execution proceedings, including attachment operations, pending final disposal of the RSA, maintaining status quo to preserve the subject matter of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case