SRI RANJAN KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, FISHERY,SC, FINANCE — WP(C)/2252/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 26th March 2026.
CNR: GAHC010088542025
e-Filing Number
24-04-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/5089/2025
Filing Date
25-Apr-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/2252/2025
Registration Date
29-Apr-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10039 - Retirement benefits with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI RANJAN KUMAR DAS
Adv. MR. S K GOSWAMI,MR. R SHARMA,MR. R SHARMA, ,MR. B K GOSWAMI,MR. R SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, FISHERY,SC, FINANCE
-
2.THE CHAIRMAN
-
3.ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
-
4.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Summary The Gauhati High Court allowed writ petitions by four retired employees of Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Limited (AFDCL), ruling that their gratuity and pensionary benefits cannot be withheld merely due to pending Enforcement Directorate investigations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court held that gratuity is a statutory right protected under Article 300A of the Constitution and can only be forfeited under specific conditions in the Payment of Gratuity Act—none of which were satisfied here, as the petitioners were not named in the FIR and no disciplinary proceedings were initiated against them. The court directed release of all pensionary benefits within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
03-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
-
22-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
05-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
03-Nov-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
- Admission With Notice Served - Reply Filed -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
13-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
- Admission With Notice Served - Reply Filed -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
18-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
- Admission With Notice Served - Reply Filed -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
10-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Honourable Mrs. Justice Marli VankungView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
13-Aug-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
- For Motion -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
02-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
09-May-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
09-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2252/2025
Summary The Gauhati High Court allowed writ petitions by four retired employees of Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Limited (AFDCL), ruling that their gratuity and pensionary benefits cannot be withheld merely due to pending Enforcement Directorate investigations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court held that gratuity is a statutory right protected under Article 300A of the Constitution and can only be forfeited under specific conditions in the Payment of Gratuity Act—none of which were satisfied here, as the petitioners were not named in the FIR and no disciplinary proceedings were initiated against them. The court directed release of all pensionary benefits within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts