M/S BORTHAKUR AND ASSOCIATES vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, GMC — Review.Pet./88/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 114. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: GAHC010088332026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
Review.Pet./5031/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
Review.Pet./88/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10295 - Review Applications In Civil Rule ( 328 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S BORTHAKUR AND ASSOCIATES
Adv. MR. R GOSWAMI,DR. N BAROOAH,DR. N BAROOAH, ,D GOSWAMI,MR D BHATTACHARYA,DR. N BAROOAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, GMC
-
2.GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
-
3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
03-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Case Summary: Review.Pet./88/2026 M/S Borthakur and Associates filed a review petition challenging an order from May 17, 2023 regarding unpaid consultancy fees for DPR preparation. The petitioner claimed GMC misunderstood the bill calculation—the Rs. 14,77,835 balance excluded previously paid amounts of Rs. 3,72,475 and Rs. 2,79,330, resulting in underpayment. The court issued notice returnable July 22, 2026, and directed GMC authorities to file an affidavit examining the calculation discrepancies raised in the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Review.Pet./88/2026
Case Summary: Review.Pet./88/2026 M/S Borthakur and Associates filed a review petition challenging an order from May 17, 2023 regarding unpaid consultancy fees for DPR preparation. The petitioner claimed GMC misunderstood the bill calculation—the Rs. 14,77,835 balance excluded previously paid amounts of Rs. 3,72,475 and Rs. 2,79,330, resulting in underpayment. The court issued notice returnable July 22, 2026, and directed GMC authorities to file an affidavit examining the calculation discrepancies raised in the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts