M/S BORTHAKUR AND ASSOCIATES vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, GMC — Review.Pet./88/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 114. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

CNR: GAHC010088332026

Next Hearing

22nd July 2026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

Review.Pet./5031/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

Review.Pet./88/2026

Registration Date

25-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10295 - Review Applications In Civil Rule ( 328 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 114

Petitioner(s)

M/S BORTHAKUR AND ASSOCIATES

Adv. MR. R GOSWAMI,DR. N BAROOAH,DR. N BAROOAH, ,D GOSWAMI,MR D BHATTACHARYA,DR. N BAROOAH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, GMC

GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

22-07-2026

ORDERS

Orders

03-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Case Summary: Review.Pet./88/2026 M/S Borthakur and Associates filed a review petition challenging an order from May 17, 2023 regarding unpaid consultancy fees for DPR preparation. The petitioner claimed GMC misunderstood the bill calculation—the Rs. 14,77,835 balance excluded previously paid amounts of Rs. 3,72,475 and Rs. 2,79,330, resulting in underpayment. The court issued notice returnable July 22, 2026, and directed GMC authorities to file an affidavit examining the calculation discrepancies raised in the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Review.Pet./88/2026 M/S Borthakur and Associates filed a review petition challenging an order from May 17, 2023 regarding unpaid consultancy fees for DPR preparation. The petitioner claimed GMC misunderstood the bill calculation—the Rs. 14,77,835 balance excluded previously paid amounts of Rs. 3,72,475 and Rs. 2,79,330, resulting in underpayment. The court issued notice returnable July 22, 2026, and directed GMC authorities to file an affidavit examining the calculation discrepancies raised in the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case