SHAHANUR ISLAM vs THE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WP(C)/2374/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010087102026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/4960/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2374/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10189 - Other Civil Rules relating to other Writ Petitions. ( 247 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAHANUR ISLAM

    Adv. MR. R ALI,MISS. S PARBIN,MISS. S PARBIN, ,MR H A AHMED,MISS. S PARBIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

  2. 2.THE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE

  3. 3.THE BANK OF INDIA, GOALPARA BRANCH

  4. 4.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE

  5. 5.THE UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: Shahanur Islam filed a writ petition at Gauhati High Court challenging the freezing of his Bank of India account (No. 502410110010182) by Cyber Police Station, Nagpur City, in connection with a cybercrime case. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks to all respondents (Bank of India and Union of India), directing the petitioner's counsel to serve notice on respondents 1-4 within two working days and permitting Dasti mode service for respondent No. 3. The matter was listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2374/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shahanur Islam filed a writ petition at Gauhati High Court challenging the freezing of his Bank of India account (No. 502410110010182) by Cyber Police Station, Nagpur City, in connection with a cybercrime case. The court issued notice returnable in four weeks to all respondents (Bank of India and Union of India), directing the petitioner's counsel to serve notice on respondents 1-4 within two working days and permitting Dasti mode service for respondent No. 3. The matter was listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case