NIRMALA NAMASUDRA vs NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MS. R D MOZUMDAR — I.A.(Civil)/1450/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010086932026
e-Filing Number
04-05-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/4946/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1450/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRMALA NAMASUDRA
Adv. MR. M TALUKDAR
-
2.RAJIB NAMASUDRA
Adv. MR MITHUN TALUKDAR
-
3.RIYA NAMASUDRA
Adv. MR MITHUN TALUKDAR
-
4.RANJIT BISWAS ALIAS RANJIT NAMASUDRA
Adv. MR MITHUN TALUKDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MS. R D MOZUMDAR
-
2.SOMA CHAKRABORTY
-
3.MD SHAIN AHMED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioners (family members of a deceased earning member) to withdraw Rs. 4,00,000 out of Rs. 6,85,625 (50% of the awarded amount) deposited by National Insurance Co Ltd, subject to furnishing an indemnity bond of equal amount. The court considered the petitioners' financial hardship following the family's sole earner's death, despite the insurer's objection based on alleged vehicle irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1450/2026
The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioners (family members of a deceased earning member) to withdraw Rs. 4,00,000 out of Rs. 6,85,625 (50% of the awarded amount) deposited by National Insurance Co Ltd, subject to furnishing an indemnity bond of equal amount. The court considered the petitioners' financial hardship following the family's sole earner's death, despite the insurer's objection based on alleged vehicle irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts