JAMAL UDDIN AND 61 ORS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 13 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE,SC, HEALTH,SC, FOREST — WP(C)/2429/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010086922026
e-Filing Number
04-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/4945/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2429/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10154 - Eviction from land. ( 147 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMAL UDDIN AND 61 ORS
Adv. MR. A R BHUYAN,S LASKAR,S LASKAR, ,MR N Z CHOUDHURY,S LASKAR
-
2.HUSSAIN AHMED
-
3.KAMAR UDDIN
-
4.IZAZUR RAHMAN
-
5.NASIR UDDIN
-
6.ANOWAR HUSSAIN
-
7.JAMAL UDDIN
-
8.NIMAR ALI
-
9.ASADDAR ALI
-
10.AINUL HAQUE
-
11.KAMAL UDDIN
-
12.MOINUL HOQUE ALIAS HAQUE
-
13.CHABIR UDDIN
-
14.MD ALAUR ALIAS ALAUR RAHMAN
-
15.RIAJUL HOQUE
-
16.NAJIM UDDIN
-
17.SURMAN ALI
-
18.NASHIR UDDIN
-
19.KHAIRUL HOQUE
-
20.SALIM UDDIN ALIAS CHELIM UDDIN LASKAR
-
21.RUBUL AHMED ALIAS RUBUL UDDIN
-
22.SHARIF UDDIN
-
23.KABIR UDDIN
-
24.MINAJUL HOQUE
-
25.AMINA BEGUM
-
26.HABIBUR RAHMAN LASKAR
-
27.MARAHAM ALI
-
28.ABDUL MATLIB
-
29.LAL MIYAN
-
30.ABU BAKKAR
-
31.MOHAMMAD HASON AHMED
-
32.SAYERA KHATUN
-
33.NURUL HAQUE
-
34.HUSSAIN AHMED
-
35.HABI RAHMAN
-
36.TAJ UDDIN
-
37.RASMINA BEGUM
-
38.RAHMAN ALIAS REKHAMAN ALI
-
39.SURAJ ALI
-
40.SABED ALI
-
41.ALIM UDDIN
-
42.BATAI MIYA
-
43.JAMAL UDDIN
-
44.MASAID ALI
-
45.FAJAR ALI
-
46.KHAIRUL ISLAM LASKAR
-
47.SALIM UDDIN
-
48.DULAL AHMED
-
49.ABDUL KHALIK
-
50.KACHIM ALI LASKAR
-
51.HABIBUR RAHMAN
-
52.ASHIK ALIAS ASIK UDDIN
-
53.MAHIBUR RAHMAN
-
54.HUSSAIN AHMED
-
55.KUTUB UDDIN
-
56.IBRAHIM ALI
-
57.HILAL AHMED
-
58.SHOROF UDDIN LASKAR
-
59.AKLAS UDDIN LASKAR
-
60.KAFIL UDDIN
-
61.KURMAN ALI
-
62.MOFIK UDDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 13 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE,SC, HEALTH,SC, FOREST
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
-
3.THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
-
4.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE AND WILDLIFE
-
5.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
6.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
7.THE JOINT DIRECTOR
-
8.THE DISTRICT FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES OFFICER
-
9.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
-
10.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
11.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
-
12.THE CIRCLE OFFICER
-
13.THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
-
14.THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2429/2026 Case: Jamal Uddin and 61 Others v. The State of Assam and 13 Others Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: Petition adjourned for four weeks; notice issued to respondents; interim relief to be considered at next hearing. Facts: 62 petitioners challenged demolition of their house structures carried out by the Forest Authority, South Nagaon Division, Hojai, pursuant to eviction proceedings. Petitioners contended they lawfully possessed the disputed land, which was neither forest nor government revenue land, and that demolition was arbitrary and illegal as no due legal procedure was followed. Court Order: Notice returnable in four weeks; matter listed after four weeks; interim prayer to be considered on next returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2429/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2429/2026 Case: Jamal Uddin and 61 Others v. The State of Assam and 13 Others Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: Petition adjourned for four weeks; notice issued to respondents; interim relief to be considered at next hearing. Facts: 62 petitioners challenged demolition of their house structures carried out by the Forest Authority, South Nagaon Division, Hojai, pursuant to eviction proceedings. Petitioners contended they lawfully possessed the disputed land, which was neither forest nor government revenue land, and that demolition was arbitrary and illegal as no due legal procedure was followed. Court Order: Notice returnable in four weeks; matter listed after four weeks; interim prayer to be considered on next returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts