DHIRAJ DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/460/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010086432026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/3714/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/460/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund

Coram

Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRAJ DAS

    Adv. MR SAURADEEP DEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court granted Dhiraj Das's application for condonation of 111 days delay in filing a connected appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court accepted his counsel's submissions that the delay resulted from poverty and lack of awareness about procedural timelines, finding sufficient grounds with no mala fide intent. The court accordingly condoned the delay and directed the registry to register the connected appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/460/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court granted Dhiraj Das's application for condonation of 111 days delay in filing a connected appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court accepted his counsel's submissions that the delay resulted from poverty and lack of awareness about procedural timelines, finding sufficient grounds with no mala fide intent. The court accordingly condoned the delay and directed the registry to register the connected appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case