SANJIB CHOUDHURY AND 11 ORS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,SC, FINANCE — WP(C)/2343/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010086262026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/4921/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2343/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10008 - Salary and allowances with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJIB CHOUDHURY AND 11 ORS

    Adv. MR. I H SAIKIA,MS L HMAR,MS L HMAR, ,MR. K KALITA,MR K KASHYAB,MS L HMAR

  2. 2.SUBRATA SEKHAR DAS

  3. 3.ARPITA DAS

  4. 4.SOUMITRA DEB ROY

  5. 5.RAJ SEKHAR DEB

  6. 6.BISWAJIT DAS

  7. 7.SWAROOP DUTTA

  8. 8.RUPAK DEB

  9. 9.RAHUL DEB

  10. 10.JAHURA KHANAM

  11. 11.SHIRSENDU SHEE

  12. 12.SANJOY KUMAR PAUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,SC, FINANCE

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo

  3. 05-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 2343/2026 - Gauhati High Court Twelve petitioners sought directions to restore their pay scale based on their initial appointment terms. They previously won relief in WP(C) 5032/2007, where the court ordered payment within six months; that judgment was upheld after the State's appeal withdrawal and subsequent review petition dismissal (28.04.2023). The petitioners challenged a 30.01.2021 order reclassifying them as fixed-pay Tutors. The case was adjourned for four weeks with notice issued; the respondent authorities were directed to file a detailed affidavit justifying the reclassification despite the prior court finding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 2343/2026 - Gauhati High Court Twelve petitioners sought directions to restore their pay scale based on their initial appointment terms. They previously won relief in WP(C) 5032/2007, where the court ordered payment within six months; that judgment was upheld after the State's appeal withdrawal and subsequent review petition dismissal (28.04.2023). The petitioners challenged a 30.01.2021 order reclassifying them as fixed-pay Tutors. The case was adjourned for four weeks with notice issued; the respondent authorities were directed to file a detailed affidavit justifying the reclassification despite the prior court finding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case