M/S ABALA AUTO AGENCY vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST — WP(C)/2900/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010085192026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/4849/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2900/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10101 - Sales Tax ( 101 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ABALA AUTO AGENCY

    Adv. MR. D SARAF,MS. M DEY,MS. M DEY, ,MR. R S MISHRA,MS B SARMA,MS. M DEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, GST

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DGGI, GUWAHATI ZONAL UNIT

  4. 4.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF GST AND SERVICE TAX

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2900/2026 M/S Abala Auto Agency challenged an Order-In-Original dated 10.10.2025 confirming a GST demand of Rs. 1,58,64,297/- with penalty for financial years 2017-18 to 2019-20, alleging violation of Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim protection, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2900/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2900/2026 M/S Abala Auto Agency challenged an Order-In-Original dated 10.10.2025 confirming a GST demand of Rs. 1,58,64,297/- with penalty for financial years 2017-18 to 2019-20, alleging violation of Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and granted interim protection, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case